2026 YEAR-END GIVING

Year-end giving deadlines are coming up. See the 2026 dates for every type of gift.

EPISODE 3

Christian Generosity and Tax Wisdom: What Formation Looks Like When the Tax Code Enters the Room

The Christian who wrestles with tax incentives isn't asking about the tax code. They're asking about their own heart. Here's the formation answer.
The Christian who wrestles with tax incentives isn't asking about the tax code. They're asking about their own heart. Here's the formation answer.
EPISODE 3

Christian Generosity and Tax Wisdom: What Formation Looks Like When the Tax Code Enters the Room

Episode 6

Christian Generosity and Tax Wisdom: What Formation Looks Like When the Tax Code Enters the Room

https://anchor.fm/s/110f78058/podcast/play/120261234/https%3A%2F%2Fd3ctxlq1ktw2nl.cloudfront.net%2Fstaging%2F2026-4-20%2F424516133-44100-2-c9d2eb681f563.mp3
0:00 / 0:00

Christian Generosity and Tax Wisdom: What Formation Looks Like When the Tax Code Enters the Room

The deeper issue underneath the tax question, and how to hold passion and judgment in the same gift.

Imagine a ministry partner sitting across from a trusted advisor, describing what many would call a “good problem”: their income spiked this year, and the resulting tax bill will be significantly larger than usual. They have already been considering a meaningful gift to a ministry that has shaped their family for two decades. As the conversation unfolds, the partner offers a moment of striking honesty: “I don’t want my giving to be about the tax break, but I also can’t pretend the tax code isn’t sitting right here on the table.”

That single sentence captures the true formation question. The issue is not the tax bill. The issue is the kind of disciple this ministry partner wants to be as the decision unfolds.


Table of Contents


Why Christians Wrestle With Tax-Aware Giving

When Christians question whether tax incentives should influence their generosity, they are rarely asking about the tax code itself. They are voicing a deeper concern about their own hearts. The fear is that what appears to be a spiritual act of giving might actually be a selfish calculation in disguise, dressed up in the language of stewardship.

This concern is a sign of a conscientious follower of Christ. In fact, a believer who has never wrestled with the presence of self-interest in their giving likely hasn’t reflected deeply enough on the practice. Raising the question is, in itself, a sign of spiritual formation taking root.

The difficulty arises when this worry overshadows the solution. Some donors reach a point where any consideration of tax benefits feels like moral contamination; they ignore the tax code entirely, and passively allow God’s resources to be redirected to the government. Others swing to the opposite extreme, where tax strategy becomes the primary lens, turning an act of worship into a mere transaction. Both paths represent a failure to ask, “What would the Lord like his steward to do?”

True formation allows us to hold both realities with clarity. The gift originates from conviction, and wisdom exists to serve that conviction. They are not competitors. The donor who learns to integrate both can give with a greater sense of freedom than the one who seeks simplicity by ignoring half of the equation.

How Christian Generosity Forms the Giver

Most of what gets written about charitable giving in a Christian context treats giving as a discrete act. A gift is a thing you do. The article tells you what the act means or how to do it well, and then the act ends, and you move on with your life. Biblical generosity works differently.

Giving as formation works differently. A gift is something the giver becomes through, not just something the giver does. The ministry partner who gives consistently over decades is being shaped by the giving as surely as the recipients are being helped by it. The shaping happens in the small decisions that surround the gift. How does the ministry partner think about a windfall before it arrives? What kind of internal conversation does the ministry partner have when an asset appreciates? When tax season arrives, does the ministry partner approach it as a steward making a decision or as a taxpayer hoping to minimize an obligation?

Each of those moments is a formation moment. The tax code is one of the rooms a steward’s character walks through. What is learned in that room becomes part of who the steward is when the next decision arrives.

This is why the Christian conversation about tax-aware giving cannot be reduced to either suspicion or strategy. Suspicion will not form a generous person. Strategy will not form a faithful one. Formation requires both the conviction that gives the gift its meaning and the clarity that lets the gift do as much work as possible.

Faithful Stewardship Inside the Tax Code

Tax policy is designed to shape behavior. Eric Fleshood emphasized this point on the podcast, and it bears deeper reflection. Governments typically levy taxes on activities they wish to discourage and provide relief for those they want to promote. Consequently, the United States tax code is a historical record of societal priorities. The incentives for charitable giving exist today because previous generations of legislators recognized that a generous citizenry should not be taxed when they choose to direct funds to a vital public good.

For a Christian operating within this framework, the question isn’t whether the system is shaping them; it is. Every tax law that alters a financial outcome exerts a quiet influence on every ministry partner, all the time. The real decision is whether a believer will engage that shaping force with intent or be a passive target.

Spiritual formation calls for conscious engagement. By paying attention to what the system rewards and penalizes, we can discern which incentives align with God’s calling and which do not. The ministry partner who approaches these choices with awareness brings intention to decisions that many make on autopilot. Conversely, those who ignore the system’s influence are still shaped by it, but without the benefit of clarity or agency.

In the United States, charitable tax law is remarkably favorable, rewarding a posture of generosity that the Christian tradition has long commended. A believer who uses the tax benefits of charitable giving to fund Kingdom work has the opportunity to harmonize their faith with the law, allowing both to point in the same direction.

When Self-Suspicion Becomes Paralysis

There is a kind of Christian who has grown so suspicious of mixed motives that they have lost the ability to act. They cannot give without immediately interrogating whether the giving was pure enough. They cannot plan without worrying that planning is a betrayal of trust in God. They cannot consider the tax implications of a gift without feeling that the consideration has compromised the gift itself.

This posture sounds humble. It is a kind of paralysis dressed in spiritual clothing. A ministry partner in this state cannot be formed by giving because the ministry partner cannot complete the act. The internal interrogation never settles, and the giving never produces the formation that giving was supposed to produce.

The correction is not to abandon self-examination. The correction is to remember that a steward’s confidence sits in the owner, not in the steward’s ability to produce a perfectly pure motive. God knows the ministry partner’s heart better than the ministry partner does. The ministry partner who gives from conviction, considers wisdom, prays for clarity, and acts is being formed even when their motives are not perfect. The Christian tradition has always known this. It is one of the reasons grace has to be at the foundation of generosity. Without grace, no ministry partner can give anything, because no ministry partner can produce a motive clean enough to deserve the act.

The ministry partner who can give freely, even with mixed motives, even with awareness of tax implications, is the ministry partner whose formation is taking root. That ministry partner is learning to act inside the world they live in, with the imperfect heart they have, trusting the God who has always worked with imperfect people doing imperfect things for kingdom purposes.

Holding Wisdom and Worship Together

What does it look like to combine tax wisdom and worship at the same time?

It looks like a ministry partner who enters into a prayerful dialogue with the Owner of all things. In the quiet of their stewardship, they ask: “Lord, what do you want me to do about the taxes? Do you want the government to have this, or do you want me to take the time to learn how to redirect these taxes into Kingdom impact? Do you want your steward to have the tax savings for his own needs?” This is a person who decides to give from the heart first, then uses tax wisdom to honor that commitment. They can discuss deductions and Jesus in the same breath, viewing asset selection and timing not as distractions, but as vital acts of faithful management.

This internal conversation is not about balancing extremes; it is a single posture rooted in the absolute conviction of God’s ownership. When a ministry partner embraces their role as a steward, they realize that thinking clearly about the tax code is an extension of their worship. By seeking the Lord’s will for every dollar, including those affected by the tax code, they harmonize their practical wisdom with their spiritual devotion, making both fully available for Kingdom purposes.


Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between tax-smart giving and Christian generosity?

Christian maturity is found not in choosing between generosity and wisdom, but in blending them seamlessly. Generosity is the expression of God’s grace and love, driving the decision to give from the heart. Tax-smart giving is the clarity of the wise steward, employing practical wisdom to manage God’s resources effectively within the existing tax structure. When these two postures—the graceful giver and the wise manager—are harmonized, the result is a fuller expression of discipleship that maximizes both the spiritual formation of the donor and the practical impact of the gift.

Is it biblically wrong to think about tax benefits while giving?

Not necessarily. The Christian tradition has always made room for prudence in the practical handling of resources. Considering tax implications can become a problem when it replaces the primary intent to bless others. It is not a problem when done in the service of blessing God and others. Tools like a donor-advised fund exist for this exact reason: they let a giver hold tax wisdom and giving conviction together without forcing one to compromise the other.

How does giving form a Christian over time?

Giving shapes the giver in a number of ways including the practice of loving the other, of expressing dependence on God, of imitating God’s own generosity, and resisting greed. How a Christian thinks about wealth, how they respond to a windfall, what kind of internal conversation they have during tax season, each of these is a moment of formation. The one who gives consistently over decades is being shaped by the giving as surely as the recipients are being helped by it.

What does it mean to be a steward rather than an owner?

Stewardship is the conviction that God owns everything and that human beings are privileged to temporarily manage what passes through their hands. A steward thinks about every resource in light of what the owner would want done with it. This conviction is the foundation of Christian giving, and it is what makes tax-aware giving a stewardship decision rather than a financial calculation. More on biblical stewardship as the foundation of generosity.

Why does Cru Foundation talk about tax wisdom and faith in the same breath?

Because Christians live in the country they live in, with the tax code that exists, and faithful stewardship means thinking clearly about both. Treating these as separate categories puts ministry partners in a position where they have to choose between conviction and clarity. Holding them together lets the same conviction fund more of the kingdom work the ministry partner cares about.


Talk With Someone From the Cru Foundation Team

If this episode resonated with something you have been thinking about for a while, the next step is probably not another article. The next step is a conversation with someone who can walk through the specifics of your situation with both pastoral attention and practical knowledge.

A member of the Cru Foundation team would value the chance to have that conversation with you. There is no obligation, no pressure, and no agenda except to help you think clearly about what God has placed in front of you. You can reach a member of the team at crufoundation.org/contact, by phone at 800-449-5454, or by email at hello@crufoundation.org.


Educational Disclaimer

The content on this page is for educational and informational purposes only. It does not constitute legal, tax, or financial advice. Please consult with qualified professional advisors regarding your specific situation before making any giving or planning decisions. AI tools were used as assistance in the creation of this content.


Is It Okay for My Generosity to Depend on Tax Incentives?

Katie Brubaker: Welcome to the Smarter Generosity podcast. I’m Katie Brubaker.

Eric Fleshood: And I’m Eric Fleshood.

Katie: Today we’re asking a simple but honest question: Is it okay for my generosity to depend on tax incentives?

Eric, I wanted to open with that question because we get to work with a lot of generous donors. What role do you think tax incentives should play in generosity?

Eric: That’s a really interesting question, and I hope we can explore its different aspects because saving on taxes is something we all appreciate. I haven’t met anyone who doesn’t like to save on their tax bill. It’s also part of the conversation I’m having with people every day in the work that I do.

I think it’s important to consider what the appropriate place for tax incentives is, how we should think about them, and what role they should have in both our hearts and our practical decisions.

But there’s one distinction I want to make at the beginning, Katie. I think the question combines two definitions that we shouldn’t necessarily equate.

Generosity goes far beyond charitable donations. The tax question really has to do with giving to charity, and I think it would be a mistake to say that generosity and charitable giving are synonymous.

Charitable giving is one expression of generosity, but generosity is much bigger than that.

Katie: That’s a good clarification.

Eric: So, are tax incentives a proper motivation for charitable giving? Like a lot of things, I think it depends.

Maybe we should start by talking about some practical examples of why people want to save on taxes, particularly in our line of work.

Katie: I’ll give you one example. We often work with people toward the end of the year who have experienced an unusual spike in income.

They might decide to contribute a significant amount of cash to a donor-advised fund because their income taxes would otherwise be much higher than normal that year.

So, they’re looking at making a larger charitable contribution before the end of the year to help offset that tax liability.

Eric: That’s a great example.

Paying taxes can be painful in certain situations, especially when it puts pressure on your cash flow.

Maybe you’ve had a significant taxable event, such as receiving an inherited IRA, and suddenly you’re facing a substantial tax bill that you weren’t necessarily prepared to cover.

One of the things we’ve discussed in other episodes is this idea of ownership versus use and control.

Whenever you pay taxes, you’re fundamentally giving up control over some of the resources God has entrusted to you. Those resources are transferred to the government, which then determines how they’re used.

One way to think about the value of reducing taxes is that we’re maintaining the ability to direct more of those resources toward God’s purposes.

We’re retaining some influence over how those resources are used rather than surrendering that influence to someone else.

Katie: I think a lot of people don’t realize that charitable giving can sometimes provide alternatives when they’re facing a significant tax liability.

They assume they simply have to pay the tax because they may not have the information they need to understand what other options are available.

Eric: Yes, and I’m glad you made that point.

I think we should celebrate the fact that we live in a time and place where the United States has some remarkable charitable tax provisions.

When the government provides incentives that encourage people to support charitable causes, I think it’s worth understanding those opportunities and considering how we can put them to work for the benefit of our communities and the kingdom of God.

But sometimes people seem hesitant to admit that they’re motivated by tax savings.

They don’t necessarily want that to be their primary motivation.

I wonder if part of that discomfort comes from a concern that tax savings might be a selfish motivation. Maybe we’re worried that we’re simply trying to save money so we can spend more on ourselves rather than genuinely seeking to benefit the charity.

Perhaps that’s part of what makes people uncomfortable with the conversation.

Katie: I think that’s a great point.

I also know people who will say, “I don’t want my giving to feel transactional.”

At the same time, they don’t want to ignore practical realities. Maybe they’ve experienced an unusual increase in income, like the example I mentioned earlier, and they need to consider how that affects their financial decisions.

Sometimes people talk about those considerations almost apologetically.

But I don’t think they need to.

There’s wisdom in understanding your options and approaching those decisions with a stewardship mindset.

So I’m wondering if you could talk about that tension. How do we approach the practical realities of charitable giving without allowing generosity to become merely transactional?

Eric: Absolutely. Those practical realities matter.

Think about someone who owns a business and is preparing to sell it. Depending on the circumstances, they could be facing a significant tax liability, potentially 40 percent or more when considering the various taxes involved.

That’s painful, but it can also limit their options.

God has made us stewards over certain resources. He expects us to live responsibly with what He’s entrusted to us, and we have to consider the kind of lifestyle He’s calling us to live.

But if a substantial portion of those resources is going toward taxes, that affects what’s available for other purposes.

Now imagine that some of those resources could instead be redirected toward kingdom purposes through appropriate charitable planning.

That creates additional opportunities.

It broadens the horizon of what you can consider as a steward.

Instead of working with only a portion of the harvest, you may have opportunities to direct more of the resources God has entrusted to you toward the things He’s calling you to do.

Katie: So what I’m hearing you say is that considering tax incentives in our giving can absolutely be part of good stewardship.

Is that a fair way to summarize what you’ve been saying?

Eric: Yes, that’s right.

Katie: I want to change direction a little because we attend a lot of events where we’re talking with very generous, charitably minded people.

These people aren’t attending because they’re looking for tax incentives. They’re there because they love Cru, they love the different ministries they’re supporting, and they genuinely want to give.

For many of them, the tax benefits are nice, but they’re not the primary motivation.

So is the more important question whether tax benefits exist, or how those benefits shape our motivation for giving?

Eric: I would say it’s much more about how they shape our motivation.

If you’ve paid attention to politics and public policy over the years, you recognize that tax policy is often designed to influence behavior.

There’s an old saying: If you want less of something, tax it. If you want more of something, reduce the tax on it.

Policymakers have understood for a long time that they can influence public behavior through tax policy.

I think it’s helpful to recognize that because it gives us another lens through which to evaluate our decisions.

We can ask, “What kind of behavior is this policy trying to encourage in me? And how does that compare with what the Lord is calling His people to do in Scripture?”

Ideally, those things work together.

In many cases, charitable tax policies in the United States are designed to encourage giving to charitable organizations, including ministries.

That’s a good thing.

But I think we should also be aware that there are different influences in the world trying to shape our behavior and form us into certain kinds of people.

As Christians, we’ve already decided whom we want to follow.

We want to follow Jesus. We want to become more like Him. We want to become the kind of people He desires us to be.

And to the extent that tax policy helps us pursue those purposes, I think it can serve as a legitimate consideration in our giving.

Katie: That’s a great transition into my next question.

How do you think about the difference between generosity as worship and generosity as strategy?

Can it be both, or are those separate things?

Eric: Help me understand what you mean by generosity as strategy.

Katie: I mean using tax incentives as part of my charitable giving.

There may be financial benefits to giving, and I’m factoring those benefits into my decisions.

So generosity can become part of a tax strategy, which isn’t necessarily bad.

I agree with what you’ve said about being aware of how tax policy shapes our decisions while also recognizing the opportunities available to us in the time and place where we live.

But when all of those considerations come together in the heart of a steward, how do generosity as worship and generosity as strategy relate to one another?

Is there an intersection where those two things overlap?

Eric: I absolutely think there is.

They don’t necessarily have to be separate. They can work together.

Fundamentally, I think what we all want is to live in close communion with God, in fellowship with Him, walking in step with the Holy Spirit.

We want the gospel to be real and fresh to us every day, recognizing that His mercies are new every morning.

And from that place, we want to look forward to generously sharing the abundance God has given us with our friends, neighbors, families, churches, and the broader kingdom.

We want to do that freely, trusting that God will take care of us because He owns the cattle on a thousand hills, as the psalm says.

In that sense, our generosity reflects what we really believe about God.

Is He generous? Can He be trusted? Is He faithful?

If we genuinely believe those things, that belief will be reflected in how we live and how we give.

And that’s another way of saying we’re worshiping Him. We’re living out our calling as people made in His image.

Along with that, God has given us minds. He’s given us intelligence and the ability to think, reason, and plan.

He also knows that governments need resources to fund their operations through taxes.

But when the law provides legitimate opportunities to direct resources toward charitable purposes, it’s entirely appropriate to consider those opportunities thoughtfully.

We can ask, “How can I use the provisions available to me to direct more resources toward the things that honor God?”

That’s where wisdom and worship can work together.

Katie: What would you say to a donor who comes to you and says, “There’s that verse about rendering to Caesar what is Caesar’s and to God what is God’s. I don’t like the idea of using tax strategies when it comes to supporting ministry”?

Eric: That question does come up occasionally, and I think it’s important to be very clear about our intentions.

Our desire is to be fully obedient to the governing authorities.

Nothing we’re discussing today, or anywhere on this podcast, is intended to suggest that people should bend the law or find ways around it.

In fact, it’s exactly the opposite.

What we’re encouraging people to do is understand and responsibly use the laws that have been established.

In the United States, those laws provide significant opportunities for people who want to support charitable causes.

We have a long tradition of generosity in this country, going back even before the Constitution was ratified and before the Declaration of Independence.

Supporting our communities and participating in voluntary efforts have long been part of the fabric of American life.

As we celebrate America’s 250th anniversary this year, I think we can be grateful that this tradition has continued.

So when we talk about charitable giving strategies, we’re talking about using provisions that our elected representatives have established specifically to encourage charitable activity.

We’re talking about working within the law, respecting the law, and understanding how those provisions can help us steward resources faithfully.

Katie: I like what you said earlier about holding wisdom and worship together in generosity.

I think that’s a helpful way to think about this entire conversation.

All right, one last question.

If someone takes only one thing away from this conversation, what would you want it to be?

Eric: I think I’d want to return to this idea that our behaviors around stewardship and generosity are shaping us and preparing us.

We need to recognize that there are other people and other agendas in the world that also want to shape us into certain kinds of people.

There are influences that want us to be consumers. There are influences that encourage us to be savers. And as we’ve discussed, there are also policies and laws designed to influence our behavior.

But I think we need to step back from all of that, spend time in the Word, and remember that we’re people of the gospel.

We take our principles of spiritual formation from the Lord first.

Katie: Thank you, Eric.

Eric: Thank you, Katie.


This transcript has been edited for clarity and readability. Verbal fillers, repetitions, and recording interruptions have been removed.

This content is provided for educational purposes only and should not be considered legal or tax advice. Please consult your professional advisor regarding your specific situation.

Other Podcasts

Listen to More Episodes